Justification of the identification of threats and problematic components of sustainable regional development in the security dimension
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2023
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
E3S Web of Conferences
Abstract
The issue of substantiation of the problematic components of
sustainable development in the security dimension and threat identification
methodology is investigated. The methodology consists of directly
combining the identification of threats with the need to observe the limits
of the safe existence of dynamic economic systems, which connects the
problem of sustainable development with the problem of security. The
explanation of the extended homeostatic plateau, which explains the
conditions for the transition to a higher technological system, or the
complication of functioning and the loss of the main functions of the
existing technological system, has gained further development. A
theoretical substantiation of the limits of secure existence in terms of
security gradations is proposed: critical, threshold, and optimal on both
sides of the "extended homeostatic plateau". Quantitative values of security
gradations are associated with the extension of the "t-criterion" method for
the formal determination of bifurcation points for characteristic types of
distribution, that is, threats. The identification, classification, and analysis
of problematic components and critical threats at the level of components
and indicators were carried out, which made it possible to identify only
four strategic directions of institutional measures that allow covering
almost all indicators of sustainable development at the regional level.
Description
1. Theocharidou, M., & Giannopoulos, G. (2015). Risk assessment methodologies for critical infrastructure protection. Part II, A new approach. Publications Office. 2. Cabinet Office. (2015). National Risk Register of Civil Emergencies 2015. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk 3. Cabinet Office. (2020). National Risk Register 2020 edition. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk 4. Amiri, M., Ardeshir, A., & Fazel Zarandi, M. H. (2017). Fuzzy probabilistic expert system for occupational hazard assessment in construction. Safety Science, 93, 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.11.008. 5. El-Sayegh, S. M., Manjikian, S., Ibrahim, A., Abouelyousr, A., & Jabbour, R. (2021). Risk identification and assessment in sustainable construction projects in the UAE. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(4), 327-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1536963. 6. Hassan, M. S., Ali, Y., Petrillo, A., & De Felice, F. (2023). Risk assessment of circular economy practices in construction industry of Pakistan. The Science of the total environment, 868, 161418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161418 7. Ravishankar, B., & Christopher, P. B. (2022). Environmental threats: Exploring waste management in the Indian aviation sector. Paper presented at the ECS Transactions, 107(1) 10811-10819. https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.10811ecst. 8. Kang, X., Wang, M., Lin, J., & Li, X. (2022). Trends and status in resources security, ecological stability, and sustainable development research: A systematic analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(33), 50192-50207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19412-7. 9. Klopp, J. M., & Petretta, D. L. (2017). The urban sustainable development goal: Indicators, complexity and the politics of measuring cities. Cities, 63, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.019. 10. Nundy, S., Ghosh, A., Mesloub, A., Albaqawy, G. & Alnaim, M. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on socio-economic, energy-environment and transport sector globally and sustainable development goal (SDG). Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127705. 11. Zhang, M., Peng, C., Shu, J., & Lin, Y. (2022).Territorial Resilience of Metropolitan Regions: A Conceptual Framework, Recognition Methodologies and Planning Response – A Case Study of Wuhan Metropolitan Region. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 1914. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041914. 12. Coyle, D., & Sensier, M. (2020). The imperial treasury: appraisal methodology and regional economic performance in the UK. Regional Studies, 54(3), 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1606419 13. Boiarynova, K., Popelo, O., Tulchynska, S., Gritsenko, S.,& Prikhno, I. (2022). Conceptual Foundations of Evaluation and Forecasting of Innovative Development of Regions. Periodica Polytechnica: Social and Management Sciences, 30(2), 167-174. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.18530. 14. Li, Q., Yan, G., & Yu, C. (2022). A Novel Multi-Factor Three-Step Feature Selection
and Deep Learning Framework for Regional GDP Prediction: Evidence from China.
Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(8). 4408. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-
1050/14/8/4408/htm. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084408.
15. Papadopoulou, C.-A., Papadopoulou, M. P., & Laspidou, C. (2022). Implementing
Water-Energy-Land-Food-Climate Nexus Approach to Achieve the Sustainable
Development Goals in Greece: Indicators and Policy Recommendations. Sustainability,
14, 4100. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074100.
16. Hutsaliuk O., Levchenko A., Storozhuk O., Zalevskyi A., Doroshenko T., & Hryhorash
S. (2023). Directions for increasing the level of environmental friendliness of
innovative and investment attractiveness of transport and logistics companies. IOP
Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1126(1), 012028.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1126/1/012028
17. Cudečka-Puriņa N, Atstāja D, Koval V, Purviņš M, Nesenenko P, Tkach O. (2022).
Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals through the Implementation of
Circular Economy and Developing Regional Cooperation. Energies, 15(11), 4072.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en15114072
18. Koval, V., Hrymalyuk, A., Kulish, A., Kontseva, V., Boiko, N., & Nesenenko, P.
(2021). Economic policy of industrial development and investment approach to the
analysis of the national economy. Estudios De Economia Aplicada, 39(6).
https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i6.5263
19. Kharazishvili Yu., Lyashenko V. (2019). Strategic scenarios of sustainable
development and institutional conditions for achievement. Economic Herald of
Donbass, 3(57), 282-302. https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2019-3(57)-282-302
20. Gigch, J.P.V (1978). Applied General Systems Theory. 2nd Edition. London, UK:
HarperCollins Publishers LLC.
21. Kharazishvili, Y., & Kwilinski, A. (2022). Methodology for Determining the Limit
Values of National Security Indicators Using Artificial Intelligence Methods.
Virtual Economics, 5(4), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2022.05.04(1).
22. Hutsaliuk, O., Bondar, Iu., Kotsiurba, O., Ostapenko O., Skoptsov, K., & Boiko, O.
(2023). Factor-criteria assessment of greening prerequisites for transport infrastructure
development in Ukraine. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental
Science, 1126(1), 012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1126/1/012009
23. Hutsaliuk O., Yaroshevska O., Shmatko N., Kulko-Labyntseva I., & Navolokina A.
(2020). Stakeholder approach to selecting enterprise-bank interaction strategies.
Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 42–55.
Keywords
identification of threats, problematic components, sustainable regional development, security dimension, виявлення загроз, проблемні компоненти, сталий регіональний розвиток, безпековий вимір
Citation
Yurii Kharazishvili, Vyacheslav Lyashenko, Dmytro Bugayko, Irina Ustinova, Olga Shevchenko, Oleksandr Kalinin. Justification of the identification of threats and problematic components of sustainable regional development in the security dimension. E3S Web Conf. Volume 408, 2023 International Conference on Sustainable, Circular Management and Environmental Engineering (ISCMEE 2023). P 1 -13.