Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://er.nau.edu.ua/handle/NAU/60648
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kharazishvili, Yurii | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lyashenko, Vyacheslav | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bugayko, Dmytro | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ustinova, Irina | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shevchenko, Olga | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kalinin, Oleksandr | - |
dc.contributor.author | Харазішвілі, Юрій | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ляшенко, В'ячеслав | - |
dc.contributor.author | Бугайко, Дмитро | - |
dc.contributor.author | Устінова, Ірина | - |
dc.contributor.author | Шевченко, Ольга | - |
dc.contributor.author | Калінін, Олександр | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-21T07:41:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-21T07:41:58Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Yurii Kharazishvili, Vyacheslav Lyashenko, Dmytro Bugayko, Irina Ustinova, Olga Shevchenko, Oleksandr Kalinin. Justification of the identification of threats and problematic components of sustainable regional development in the security dimension. E3S Web Conf. Volume 408, 2023 International Conference on Sustainable, Circular Management and Environmental Engineering (ISCMEE 2023). P 1 -13. | uk_UA |
dc.identifier.uri | https://er.nau.edu.ua/handle/NAU/60648 | - |
dc.description | 1. Theocharidou, M., & Giannopoulos, G. (2015). Risk assessment methodologies for critical infrastructure protection. Part II, A new approach. Publications Office. 2. Cabinet Office. (2015). National Risk Register of Civil Emergencies 2015. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk 3. Cabinet Office. (2020). National Risk Register 2020 edition. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk 4. Amiri, M., Ardeshir, A., & Fazel Zarandi, M. H. (2017). Fuzzy probabilistic expert system for occupational hazard assessment in construction. Safety Science, 93, 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.11.008. 5. El-Sayegh, S. M., Manjikian, S., Ibrahim, A., Abouelyousr, A., & Jabbour, R. (2021). Risk identification and assessment in sustainable construction projects in the UAE. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(4), 327-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1536963. 6. Hassan, M. S., Ali, Y., Petrillo, A., & De Felice, F. (2023). Risk assessment of circular economy practices in construction industry of Pakistan. The Science of the total environment, 868, 161418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161418 7. Ravishankar, B., & Christopher, P. B. (2022). Environmental threats: Exploring waste management in the Indian aviation sector. Paper presented at the ECS Transactions, 107(1) 10811-10819. https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.10811ecst. 8. Kang, X., Wang, M., Lin, J., & Li, X. (2022). Trends and status in resources security, ecological stability, and sustainable development research: A systematic analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(33), 50192-50207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19412-7. 9. Klopp, J. M., & Petretta, D. L. (2017). The urban sustainable development goal: Indicators, complexity and the politics of measuring cities. Cities, 63, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.019. 10. Nundy, S., Ghosh, A., Mesloub, A., Albaqawy, G. & Alnaim, M. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on socio-economic, energy-environment and transport sector globally and sustainable development goal (SDG). Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127705. 11. Zhang, M., Peng, C., Shu, J., & Lin, Y. (2022).Territorial Resilience of Metropolitan Regions: A Conceptual Framework, Recognition Methodologies and Planning Response – A Case Study of Wuhan Metropolitan Region. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 1914. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041914. 12. Coyle, D., & Sensier, M. (2020). The imperial treasury: appraisal methodology and regional economic performance in the UK. Regional Studies, 54(3), 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1606419 13. Boiarynova, K., Popelo, O., Tulchynska, S., Gritsenko, S.,& Prikhno, I. (2022). Conceptual Foundations of Evaluation and Forecasting of Innovative Development of Regions. Periodica Polytechnica: Social and Management Sciences, 30(2), 167-174. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.18530. 14. Li, Q., Yan, G., & Yu, C. (2022). A Novel Multi-Factor Three-Step Feature Selection and Deep Learning Framework for Regional GDP Prediction: Evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(8). 4408. https://www.mdpi.com/2071- 1050/14/8/4408/htm. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084408. 15. Papadopoulou, C.-A., Papadopoulou, M. P., & Laspidou, C. (2022). Implementing Water-Energy-Land-Food-Climate Nexus Approach to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals in Greece: Indicators and Policy Recommendations. Sustainability, 14, 4100. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074100. 16. Hutsaliuk O., Levchenko A., Storozhuk O., Zalevskyi A., Doroshenko T., & Hryhorash S. (2023). Directions for increasing the level of environmental friendliness of innovative and investment attractiveness of transport and logistics companies. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1126(1), 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1126/1/012028 17. Cudečka-Puriņa N, Atstāja D, Koval V, Purviņš M, Nesenenko P, Tkach O. (2022). Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals through the Implementation of Circular Economy and Developing Regional Cooperation. Energies, 15(11), 4072. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15114072 18. Koval, V., Hrymalyuk, A., Kulish, A., Kontseva, V., Boiko, N., & Nesenenko, P. (2021). Economic policy of industrial development and investment approach to the analysis of the national economy. Estudios De Economia Aplicada, 39(6). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i6.5263 19. Kharazishvili Yu., Lyashenko V. (2019). Strategic scenarios of sustainable development and institutional conditions for achievement. Economic Herald of Donbass, 3(57), 282-302. https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2019-3(57)-282-302 20. Gigch, J.P.V (1978). Applied General Systems Theory. 2nd Edition. London, UK: HarperCollins Publishers LLC. 21. Kharazishvili, Y., & Kwilinski, A. (2022). Methodology for Determining the Limit Values of National Security Indicators Using Artificial Intelligence Methods. Virtual Economics, 5(4), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2022.05.04(1). 22. Hutsaliuk, O., Bondar, Iu., Kotsiurba, O., Ostapenko O., Skoptsov, K., & Boiko, O. (2023). Factor-criteria assessment of greening prerequisites for transport infrastructure development in Ukraine. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1126(1), 012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1126/1/012009 23. Hutsaliuk O., Yaroshevska O., Shmatko N., Kulko-Labyntseva I., & Navolokina A. (2020). Stakeholder approach to selecting enterprise-bank interaction strategies. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 42–55. | uk_UA |
dc.description.abstract | The issue of substantiation of the problematic components of sustainable development in the security dimension and threat identification methodology is investigated. The methodology consists of directly combining the identification of threats with the need to observe the limits of the safe existence of dynamic economic systems, which connects the problem of sustainable development with the problem of security. The explanation of the extended homeostatic plateau, which explains the conditions for the transition to a higher technological system, or the complication of functioning and the loss of the main functions of the existing technological system, has gained further development. A theoretical substantiation of the limits of secure existence in terms of security gradations is proposed: critical, threshold, and optimal on both sides of the "extended homeostatic plateau". Quantitative values of security gradations are associated with the extension of the "t-criterion" method for the formal determination of bifurcation points for characteristic types of distribution, that is, threats. The identification, classification, and analysis of problematic components and critical threats at the level of components and indicators were carried out, which made it possible to identify only four strategic directions of institutional measures that allow covering almost all indicators of sustainable development at the regional level. | uk_UA |
dc.language.iso | en | uk_UA |
dc.publisher | E3S Web of Conferences | uk_UA |
dc.subject | identification of threats | uk_UA |
dc.subject | problematic components | uk_UA |
dc.subject | sustainable regional development | uk_UA |
dc.subject | security dimension | uk_UA |
dc.subject | виявлення загроз | uk_UA |
dc.subject | проблемні компоненти | uk_UA |
dc.subject | сталий регіональний розвиток | uk_UA |
dc.subject | безпековий вимір | uk_UA |
dc.title | Justification of the identification of threats and problematic components of sustainable regional development in the security dimension | uk_UA |
dc.title.alternative | Обґрунтування виявлення загроз і проблемні складові сталого регіонального розвитку у вимірі безпеки | uk_UA |
dc.type | Article | uk_UA |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1051/e3sconf/202340801028 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Наукові статті кафедри філологічних та природничих дисциплін |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
e3sconf_iscmee2023_01028.pdf | 480.15 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.